[Discuss] IDE for GNU Makefile auto-tools

Jerry Feldman gaf.linux at gmail.com
Fri Sep 23 11:47:07 EDT 2022


I generally prefer to use ATOM https://atom.io/
It is highly customizable and had add ons for most languages. Essentially
until I worked for red Hat, I was an emacs user.

--
Jerry Feldman <gaf.linux at gmail.com>
Boston Linux and Unix http://www.blu.org
PGP key id: 6F6BB6E7
PGP Key fingerprint: 0EDC 2FF5 53A6 8EED 84D1  3050 5715 B88D 6F6
B B6E7

On Fri, Sep 23, 2022, 11:25 AM <markw at mohawksoft.com> wrote:

> I've been using vi (vim) and GNU make for decades. Through the years, I've
> tried to use an IDE, but they are all so bad for this type of project.
> Every IDE I've used has had a very proprietary view of how it should do
> projects. There was one on Windows years ago called CodeWright which was
> pretty good.
>
> Before all that I used brief.
>
> Are there any IDEs that are easy to use and just a simple "drop in" to the
> work flow?
>
> I'd like an IDE that can run make, parse the compiler output, find the
> errors, and open the source file at the location of the error?
>
> I looked at KDevelop, and in 5.2 it doesn't even seem to allow you to edit
> the project build tools any more.
>
> Any suggestions, and no, Eclipse is not an option.
>
> Lastly, I know I can do a lot of this with vim, ctags, etc. but I would
> like to use some more modern tools and maybe make life a little easier.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at lists.blu.org
> http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>


More information about the Discuss mailing list