Re: Any suugestion for good performance managed and unmanaged switch

["Ward Vandewege" <user=150@nabble.blu.org>]

 On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 10:23:53AM -0400, Matt Shields wrote: 
> On 10/30/07, Dave Peters <[hidden email]> wrote: 
> > I think about HP switch, but don't know if any other 
> > options. 
> > 1. HP ProCurve Switch 2724 unmanaged 24 ports 
> > 2. HP ProCurve Switch 2848 managed 48 ports 
> > 
> Have you looked at comparable Cisco and Dell switches? 

And don't forget dlink; their 24/48 port managed switches offer a lot of bang 
for the buck. I've got several in production and am happy with them. The cli 
interface is quite cisco-like. 

Thanks, 
Ward. 

-- 
Pong.be         -(  "Be strict when sending and tolerant when receiving."  )- 
Virtual hosting -(  RFC 1958 - Architectural Principles of the Internet -  )- 
http://pong.be  -(                       section 3.9                       )- 
GnuPG public key: http://pgp.mit.edu

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and 
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is 
believed to be clean. 

_______________________________________________ 
Discuss mailing list 
[hidden email] 
http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss