Microsoft hits new ethical low point?

[warlord at MIT.EDU (Derek Atkins)]

John Chambers <jc at trillian.mit.edu> writes:

> In comparison, I have Unix software that I wrote 15  years  ago  that
> still compiles and runs without problems on any Unix-like system from
> any vendor.
> 
> We really should be publicising things like this.  If  you  seriously
> want  a  common platform, Microsoft flunks even the most basic tests,
> while Unix, with all its warts, does a fairly decent job of providing
> portability  across  years, hardware changes, and even major rewrites
> of the kernel.

<Devil's Advocate>
But I have to recompile my software for every release of Linux,
Solaris, IRIX, OSF/DUnix, *BSD, etc.  I don't have to recompile my
software for Windows.  Once I've built it, it works.  It will work on
all variants, and it will work on all systems.  I can't even build a
single Linux application that will work on all versions of a single
release of Linux (it wont work across Linux/x86, Linux/sparc,
Linux/ppc, Linux/alpha, etc.)
</Devil's Advocate>

-derek
-- 
       Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory
       Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board  (SIPB)
       URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/    PP-ASEL-IA     N1NWH
       warlord at MIT.EDU                        PGP key available
-
Subcription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with
"subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" on the first line of the
message body to discuss-request at blu.org (Subject line is ignored).