Boston Linux & Unix (BLU) Home | Calendar | Mail Lists | List Archives | Desktop SIG | Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings
Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Blog | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU

BLU Discuss list archive


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

WordPerfect 8



> I downloaded it yesterday.  It has plenty of functionality, it was a snap
> to install, and I printed some good-looking test pages with it.  It
> _works_ pretty well, but it doesn't _look_ as good as Word, entirely
> because of the screen fonts (the printed fonts are fine).  What is the
> story with fonts in X?  Netscape looks OK, and hardly anything else does,
> and Netscape  seems to have its own fonts which nothing else can use.  I'm
> not about to go back to MS Windows, but I find it hard to sell free Unix
> to friends and family when most of the apps have clunky-looking screen
> fonts.

I'm curious to see what you're talking about.  Could you send me a document
that displays with clunky-looking fonts?  Thanks.

***
Subcription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with subject of
"subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" to discuss-request at blu.org




BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities.

Valid HTML 4.01! Valid CSS!



Boston Linux & Unix / webmaster@blu.org