file shredding tools
Kent Borg
kentborg at borg.org
Tue Apr 15 17:08:24 EDT 2008
Ben Holland wrote:
> If someone gets hold of a disk and it's AES encrypted, they won't be
> able to break it any time soon.
Assuming a good key, yes.
> Why would refusing to open the encrypted file be any different then
> refusing to vpn in? ~Ben
It is a legal and political difference.
Customs thinks they can look at whatever passes physically before them.
They think they can ask you to unlock your suitcase. They think they
can ask you to decrypt your files. If you say "no", they can make your
life difficult.
But, even in this strange day-and-age, where search warrants aren't
needed and torture is acceptable, there seems to be a reluctance to
force one to cyber-burglarize ones own employer as a condition to
returning to the country.
Major corporation IT departments are doing the VPN route over the
encrypted route. They see a difference.
Now, admittedly I am messing with the boundaries here. One might
consider the "key" to be every 16th byte. But if one treated a whole
120GB drive this way the "key" would still be a 7.5 GB file. I imagine
that as a practical matter the mangling of data could be less than
1-in-16. Maybe 1-in-32 or 1-in-64?, but the missing data would still be
substantial (4 or 2 GB).
-kb
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
More information about the Discuss
mailing list