BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] AD/LDAP authentication
- Subject: [Discuss] AD/LDAP authentication
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2017 11:15:29 -0500
- In-reply-to: <CAPN2fFK5R9pT1wJFo_-ewzMw2fGW8-uXe9TWQ_noW7oCNUO3hQ@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <9f056614-28a4-c612-8657-e4b83a6b44ec@gmail.com> <f777797b-0c2a-bfea-ce1e-08ff2a067f60@napc.com> <0bf115bc-ca3f-dda1-fdcb-669f03243b3a@gmail.com> <CAPN2fFK5R9pT1wJFo_-ewzMw2fGW8-uXe9TWQ_noW7oCNUO3hQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 12/14/2017 10:50 AM, Betsy Schwartz wrote: > Another direction might be to set them both up as slave servers to a > primary LDAP server . We'd rather not add more authentication servers or proxies to the mix. Using the two directories directly is preferred if at all possible. -- Rich P.
- References:
- [Discuss] AD/LDAP authentication
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] AD/LDAP authentication
- From: gmongardi at napc.com (Grant NAPC)
- [Discuss] AD/LDAP authentication
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] AD/LDAP authentication
- From: betsys at gmail.com (Betsy Schwartz)
- [Discuss] AD/LDAP authentication
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] AD/LDAP authentication
- Next by Date: [Discuss] BARC 2018 @ MIT Jan 26
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] AD/LDAP authentication
- Next by thread: [Discuss] AD/LDAP authentication
- Index(es):
