BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] EOMA68 Computer
- Subject: [Discuss] EOMA68 Computer
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 12:38:37 -0400
- In-reply-to: <f652da20-2cec-9617-84d2-ed6c4b5399fc@riseup.net>
- References: <e9e40b25-c731-1a70-cd13-9714f43948fd@riseup.net> <68490efc-c9f0-21cb-0fae-d7af0abf95a2@gmail.com> <3bf05a13-2e5e-159f-1fe6-fa6803eeb400@riseup.net> <f684bdfc-63bb-d5ba-d427-c186d66b20d7@gmail.com> <f652da20-2cec-9617-84d2-ed6c4b5399fc@riseup.net>
On 7/20/2016 11:41 AM, IngeGNUe wrote: > The EOMA people handling the manufacturing though. Like I wrote yesterday: they found a loophole that lets them use a SoC from a company which is notorious for... but I repeat myself. They may technically comply with the letter of the RYF certification but by using Allwinner they do not comply with the spirit. -- Rich P.
- References:
- [Discuss] EOMA68 Computer
- From: ingegnue at riseup.net (IngeGNUe)
- [Discuss] EOMA68 Computer
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- [Discuss] EOMA68 Computer
- From: ingegnue at riseup.net (IngeGNUe)
- [Discuss] EOMA68 Computer
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- [Discuss] EOMA68 Computer
- From: ingegnue at riseup.net (IngeGNUe)
- [Discuss] EOMA68 Computer
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] EOMA68 Computer
- Next by Date: [Discuss] EOMA68 Computer
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] EOMA68 Computer
- Next by thread: [Discuss] EOMA68 Computer
- Index(es):
