BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] Govt Source Code Policy
- Subject: [Discuss] Govt Source Code Policy
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2016 10:36:04 -0400
- In-reply-to: <CANaytceFGXOYOZrYfGGh-Fqiu9hPLZzHscRn+hkDg13y4_BsWg@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CANaytcd4GaTv2790aYUxuh8N2czR4HcHeZasSKBvctaHzAxurA@mail.gmail.com> <87fuvd43hq.fsf@host378.hostmonster.com> <CANaytceFGXOYOZrYfGGh-Fqiu9hPLZzHscRn+hkDg13y4_BsWg@mail.gmail.com>
On 3/27/2016 8:38 AM, Greg Rundlett (freephile) wrote: > Software is completely different than roads or schools. But you already > know that. So I don't know why you're making this argument. Asserting that software is different from physical works validates the premise that prepending "software to" or appending "on the Internet" to an idea makes for a new, different, patentable idea. -- Rich P.
- References:
- [Discuss] Govt Source Code Policy
- From: greg at freephile.com (Greg Rundlett (freephile))
- [Discuss] Govt Source Code Policy
- From: greg at freephile.com (Greg Rundlett (freephile))
- [Discuss] Govt Source Code Policy
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] MIT Media Lab Changes Software Default to FLOSS
- Next by Date: [Discuss] MIT Media Lab Changes Software Default to FLOSS
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] Govt Source Code Policy
- Next by thread: [Discuss] Govt Source Code Policy
- Index(es):
