BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] Local ISP Recommendations?
- Subject: [Discuss] Local ISP Recommendations?
- From: blu at nedharvey.com (Edward Ned Harvey (blu))
- Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2016 19:38:27 +0000
- In-reply-to: <20160122150429.GA20794@SDF.ORG>
- References: <569D0076.8010200@borg.org> <CACW6n4upBgktQYjr25P8jnHtB4Gn-8_-5C29E98bzNqL9VsPcg@mail.gmail.com> <569D29B2.5040009@borg.org> <569D2F45.3020104@mattgillen.net> <56A1C016.2060700@thekramers.net> <BY2PR04MB18423155516C23A698739E16DCC40@BY2PR04MB1842.namprd04.prod.outlook.com> <20160122150429.GA20794@SDF.ORG>
> From: Mike Small [mailto:smallm at SDF.ORG] > > Has this scenario, [...] ever happened to anyone > in a real legal case where the innocent party wasn't able to > establish his or her innocence? Dunno. Those people aren't called "innocent." There's no way to identify false convictions, except by later exonerations. It's not like new forms of innocence-proving evidence are being created, like DNA evidence etc.
- References:
- [Discuss] Local ISP Recommendations?
- From: kentborg at borg.org (Kent Borg)
- [Discuss] Local ISP Recommendations?
- From: kentborg at borg.org (Kent Borg)
- [Discuss] Local ISP Recommendations?
- From: me at mattgillen.net (Matthew Gillen)
- [Discuss] Local ISP Recommendations?
- From: david at thekramers.net (David Kramer)
- [Discuss] Local ISP Recommendations?
- From: blu at nedharvey.com (Edward Ned Harvey (blu))
- [Discuss] Local ISP Recommendations?
- From: smallm at SDF.ORG (Mike Small)
- [Discuss] Local ISP Recommendations?
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] Local ISP Recommendations?
- Next by Date: [Discuss] Local ISP Recommendations?
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] Local ISP Recommendations?
- Next by thread: [Discuss] Local ISP Recommendations?
- Index(es):
