[Discuss] CU attempts to end robocalls [OT]

[michael.tiernan at gmail.com (Michael Tiernan)]

On 12/7/15 5:05 PM, Grant Mongardi wrote:
> I always thought this would be simple for the major carriers [...]
Doesn't that assumption (which I'm sure we've all had) predicate itself 
on them *wanting* to stop this traffic? Traffic=$$$$ so why interfere 
with it? They'd have to spend money to prevent money from coming in. 
Doesn't seem to be a good choice from a strictly business standpoint.

Now, if we could penalize them, say treble charges, for each occurrence 
of a ?session? being initiated/transferred/perpetuated, then the cost 
balances would shift and it would be in their business interests to 
change these things.

-- 
   << MCT >> Michael C Tiernan. http://www.linkedin.com/in/mtiernan
   Non Impediti Ratione Cogatationis
   Women and cats will do as they please, and men and dogs
    should relax and get used to the idea. -Robert A. Heinlein