BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] NAS: lots of bays vs. lots of boxes
- Subject: [Discuss] NAS: lots of bays vs. lots of boxes
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2015 13:14:28 -0400
- In-reply-to: <BY1PR0401MB16412D025F07853FACE191B8DC9E0@BY1PR0401MB1641.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
- References: <mailman.16397.1436555755.2348.discuss@blu.org> <06CF7A12-1C25-4648-8394-1DCA9C3AD35F@pioneer.ci.net> <BY1PR0401MB16412D025F07853FACE191B8DC9E0@BY1PR0401MB1641.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
On 7/11/2015 8:55 AM, Edward Ned Harvey (blu) wrote: > It took a surprisingly long time for SSD's to get faster than > sustainable 1Gbit/sec, but they've accomplished it now. Nowadays, I > expect a typical SSD to actually be limited by the 6Gbit bus. The two Crucial BX100 drives in my notebook easily hit the 6Gbit/s (~500MB/s) bus limit and these are budget drives. The world is moving forward with direct PCI Express. Fastest drives right now are 2.5GByte/s read, 1.5GByte/s write. Massive parallelism for the win. -- Rich P.
- References:
- [Discuss] NAS: lots of bays vs. lots of boxes
- From: richb at pioneer.ci.net (Rich Braun)
- [Discuss] NAS: lots of bays vs. lots of boxes
- From: blu at nedharvey.com (Edward Ned Harvey (blu))
- [Discuss] NAS: lots of bays vs. lots of boxes
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] NAS: lots of bays vs. lots of boxes
- Next by Date: [Discuss] OpenSWAN VPN
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] NAS: lots of bays vs. lots of boxes
- Next by thread: [Discuss] NAS: lots of bays vs. lots of boxes
- Index(es):
