BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] Distributed file systems
- Subject: [Discuss] Distributed file systems
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- Date: Sun, 05 Jul 2015 12:04:54 -0400
- In-reply-to: <844CEA36-22DB-4BD2-AB78-5839D24DE4C1@pioneer.ci.net>
- References: <mailman.15787.1436101490.2348.discuss@blu.org> <844CEA36-22DB-4BD2-AB78-5839D24DE4C1@pioneer.ci.net>
>> I think the leaders in this space are glusterfs, and ceph. I'm not sure who originally wrote this but... fsvo "leaders". What I've seen from all of the Linux cluster file systems is solutions to specific problems or classes of problems. This is a lot of why GlusterFS is better than, say, Hadoop for some things but worse for others, and vice-versa. They are solutions for different problems. Nobody in the Linux world has done any serious work on soup to nuts cluster systems like DEC's OSF-1 clustering. -- Rich P.
- References:
- [Discuss] Distributed file systems
- From: richb at pioneer.ci.net (Rich Braun)
- [Discuss] Distributed file systems
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] Distributed file systems
- Next by Date: [Discuss] NAS: encryption
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] Distributed file systems
- Next by thread: [Discuss] NAS: encryption
- Index(es):
