BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] bitnami stacks are awful
- Subject: [Discuss] bitnami stacks are awful
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2015 11:38:10 -0500
- In-reply-to: <CANaytceaFN9pjQYiqQo=hZMrvRoXugEbye2NGuB0L_-LJHCfhQ@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CANaytcdQpyMcy-JMHKmOGAkh169dk3JtYRpc9UuWAGD+p0odvg@mail.gmail.com> <CAOTD2YQ=eXmgtcXaSioGL_bJVgCjE9Kt0y-pP9_hCS-ZumV2XQ@mail.gmail.com> <CANaytceaFN9pjQYiqQo=hZMrvRoXugEbye2NGuB0L_-LJHCfhQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 3/6/2015 8:49 AM, Greg Rundlett (freephile) wrote: > compounded by the tendency for users of said vendor apparaturs to believe > that application deployment or System Administration is something that can > be done in two clicks and 15 minutes. When in fact it takes less than 5 minutes and a light timer: https://xkcd.com/1495/ :) -- Rich P.
- Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] bitnami stacks are awful
- From: jomalloy at gmail.com (John Malloy)
- [Discuss] bitnami stacks are awful
- References:
- [Discuss] bitnami stacks are awful
- From: greg at freephile.com (Greg Rundlett (freephile))
- [Discuss] bitnami stacks are awful
- From: matt at mattshields.org (Matt Shields)
- [Discuss] bitnami stacks are awful
- From: greg at freephile.com (Greg Rundlett (freephile))
- [Discuss] bitnami stacks are awful
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] bitnami stacks are awful
- Next by Date: [Discuss] bitnami stacks are awful
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] bitnami stacks are awful
- Next by thread: [Discuss] bitnami stacks are awful
- Index(es):
