[Discuss] No-SQL Database Recommendation?

[richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)]

On 1/10/2015 5:39 PM, markw at mohawksoft.com wrote:
> Using a free database like PostgreSQL will EASILY handle what you want to do.

Indeed. There are only two technical reasons for rejecting relational 
databases out of hand. Neither of them are in the listed requirements.

The first is that your data doesn't fit neatly into table rows. Hospital 
patient records are my go-to example. Relational databases suck at 
storing and retrieving this kind of data. Trying to make the data fit 
into tables anyway is a recipe for disaster.

The second is that you need to scale beyond the capacity of the 
underlying hardware to handle relational queries. This means very large 
data sets and very complex queries. Relational database performance 
drops in proportion to data size and query complexity.

-- 
Rich P.