BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] DMARC issue, Yahoo and beyond
- Subject: [Discuss] DMARC issue, Yahoo and beyond
- From: gaf at blu.org (Jerry Feldman)
- Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 07:34:35 -0400
- In-reply-to: <53764C64.4070308@gmail.com>
- References: <49ef9e53017b42958b2c16e83c5668dc@CO2PR04MB684.namprd04.prod.outlook.com> <53762E66.8010204@horne.net> <53763247.6010402@gmail.com> <53764235.5040904@horne.net> <53764C64.4070308@gmail.com>
On 05/16/2014 01:35 PM, Richard Pieri wrote: > The "[Discuss]" tags are unnecessary. Every message that comes through > the list has readily identifiable Sender (RFC 2822) and List-ID (RFC > 2919) field contents. I beg to differ. While I use LIST-ID, many users have rules based on the subject line. While, on this list, if I turned this off it probably would not matter too much, but there are some lists we have where the computer literacy can be pretty low. -- Jerry Feldman <gaf at blu.org> Boston Linux and Unix PGP key id:3BC1EB90 PGP Key fingerprint: 49E2 C52A FC5A A31F 8D66 C0AF 7CEA 30FC 3BC1 EB90
- Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] DMARC issue, Yahoo and beyond
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] DMARC issue, Yahoo and beyond
- References:
- [Discuss] DMARC issue, Yahoo and beyond
- From: blu at nedharvey.com (Edward Ned Harvey (blu))
- [Discuss] DMARC issue, Yahoo and beyond
- From: bill at horne.net (Bill Horne)
- [Discuss] DMARC issue, Yahoo and beyond
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] DMARC issue, Yahoo and beyond
- From: bill at horne.net (Bill Horne)
- [Discuss] DMARC issue, Yahoo and beyond
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] DMARC issue, Yahoo and beyond
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] DMARC issue, Yahoo and beyond
- Next by Date: [Discuss] DMARC issue, Yahoo and beyond
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] DMARC issue, Yahoo and beyond
- Next by thread: [Discuss] DMARC issue, Yahoo and beyond
- Index(es):
