BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] smallest board that can handle 32 GB RAM
- Subject: [Discuss] smallest board that can handle 32 GB RAM
- From: me at mattgillen.net (Matthew Gillen)
- Date: Fri, 09 May 2014 20:46:24 -0400
- In-reply-to: <li661le8vmc.fsf@panix5.panix.com>
- References: <536AF0F7.80707@gmail.com> <536B80EC.2080005@borg.org> <li661le8vmc.fsf@panix5.panix.com>
On 5/9/2014 5:55 PM, Mike Small wrote: > But if you have 16 GB (or 32 GB!?!) you should > definitely recompile all your programs with debugging > symbols in case one crashes. It's very annoying when > programs crash and you don't have symbols. Fedora implemented a solution to this in debuginfo rpms. You can install them on demand to make your core-dumps of all your distro-provided programs more useful: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/StackTraces The ABRT tool can even auto install the debuginfo packages for you when making a bug report. Matt
- References:
- [Discuss] smallest board that can handle 32 GB RAM
- From: tmetro+blu at gmail.com (Tom Metro)
- [Discuss] smallest board that can handle 32 GB RAM
- From: kentborg at borg.org (Kent Borg)
- [Discuss] smallest board that can handle 32 GB RAM
- From: smallm at panix.com (Mike Small)
- [Discuss] smallest board that can handle 32 GB RAM
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] OT: Cambridge seeks applicants for broadband task force
- Next by Date: [Discuss] business class ISP recommendations
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] OT: Cambridge seeks applicants for broadband task force
- Next by thread: [Discuss] Online vs. offline user ids
- Index(es):
