BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] Good and Bad Crypto
- Subject: [Discuss] Good and Bad Crypto
- From: jabr at gapps.blu.org (John Abreau)
- Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 19:21:23 -0400
- In-reply-to: <li67g6fyc39.fsf@panix5.panix.com>
- References: <20140423174046.GP3247@dragontoe.org> <53580798.6040309@gmail.com> <li6zjjbyi3c.fsf@panix5.panix.com> <535813B2.5030401@gmail.com> <li6fvl3ye8a.fsf@panix5.panix.com> <53582B40.80200@gmail.com> <li67g6fyc39.fsf@panix5.panix.com>
I take issue with the strawman argument about everyone needing to look at the source. As long as the source is available, it only needs one person to notice a problem and sound the alarm, and then everyone else benefits. It's not a magic guarantee, but it does give the white hats a better chance to keep up with the black hats.
- Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] Good and Bad Crypto
- From: js0000 at gmail.com (john saylor)
- [Discuss] Good and Bad Crypto
- References:
- [Discuss] Good and Bad Crypto
- From: invalid at pizzashack.org (Derek Martin)
- [Discuss] Good and Bad Crypto
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] Good and Bad Crypto
- From: smallm at panix.com (Mike Small)
- [Discuss] Good and Bad Crypto
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] Good and Bad Crypto
- From: smallm at panix.com (Mike Small)
- [Discuss] Good and Bad Crypto
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] Good and Bad Crypto
- From: smallm at panix.com (Mike Small)
- [Discuss] Good and Bad Crypto
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] Good and Bad Crypto
- Next by Date: [Discuss] Good and Bad Crypto
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] Good and Bad Crypto
- Next by thread: [Discuss] Good and Bad Crypto
- Index(es):
