Boston Linux & Unix (BLU) Home | Calendar | Mail Lists | List Archives | Desktop SIG | Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings
Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Blog | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU

BLU Discuss list archive


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Discuss] Dev Ops - architecture (local not cloud)



> On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 11:16 AM, <markw at mohawksoft.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> NFS is not as fast as a local disk, but it should not be that slow.
>>
>
> I remember the first time I set up a NetApp fileserver,back in 1999. I
> expected
> that NFS would be slower than local disk, but I was hoping the performance
> would still be acceptable.
>
> We had one of the heaviest users run his overnight jobs both on his local
> workstation and on the NetApp NFS share to compare times, and we
> discovered
> that the NetApp's NFS share gave much *faster* throughput than his local
> disks.
>
> His local desktop was a high-end Sun Ultrasparc workstation with the RAM
> maxed out and with fast SAS disks, tuned for maximum performance, yet
> over a 100Mb Ethernet, the NetApp outperformed his workstation's local
> disks.

That's impressive, especially over 100M ethernet.

>
>
> --
> John Abreau / Executive Director, Boston Linux & Unix
> Email: abreauj at gmail.com / WWW http://www.abreau.net / PGP-Key-ID
> 0x920063C6
> PGP-Key-Fingerprint A5AD 6BE1 FEFE 8E4F 5C23  C2D0 E885 E17C 9200 63C6
>





BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities.

Valid HTML 4.01! Valid CSS!



Boston Linux & Unix / webmaster@blu.org