Boston Linux & Unix (BLU) Home | Calendar | Mail Lists | List Archives | Desktop SIG | Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings
Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Blog | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU

BLU Discuss list archive


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Discuss] Scripting languages (was Re: rsync v. cp in data migration)



On 05/27/2013 11:11 AM, Richard Pieri wrote:
> I'm not a programmer. Never was, probably never will be. I'm a sysadmin.
> Bourne is my go-to language for anything repetitive for two simple
> reasons: it's there, and it doesn't change. Every UNIX and Unixalike has
> Bourne shell. Every single one. And it works the same on all of them. A
> Bourne script written for Ultrix 3 works on Solaris 9 and RHEL 6 with
> maybe a slight tweak for different paths (SysV vs. BSD vs. LSB).
>
> No other scripting language in the world meets those criteria.
>
Agreed. But, there are some differences in some of the older versions. 
Ran into that when doing some scripting at the Digital multi-system lab 
where we had scripts for Bourne (Ultrix), Bourne (HP-UX) and Bourne Sun 
OS (before Solaris). But, modern versions of SH have a standard.

-- 
Jerry Feldman <gaf at blu.org>
Boston Linux and Unix
PGP key id:3BC1EB90
PGP Key fingerprint: 49E2 C52A FC5A A31F 8D66  C0AF 7CEA 30FC 3BC1 EB90




BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities.

Valid HTML 4.01! Valid CSS!



Boston Linux & Unix / webmaster@blu.org