Boston Linux & Unix (BLU) Home | Calendar | Mail Lists | List Archives | Desktop SIG | Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings
Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Blog | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU

BLU Discuss list archive


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Discuss] Spice for a physical server?



I tried to install x2goserver, but it fails to install:

> Error: Package: nxagent-3.5.0.17-3.1.x86_64 (X11_RemoteDesktop_x2go)
>           Requires: xorg-x11-fonts-core

Apparently "xorg-x11-fonts-core" is a SuSE package that doesn't exist on
CentOS 6,
and x2goserver won't install without it.




On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Peter Jalajas <pjalajas at tebuco.com> wrote:

> Hi John,
>
> I like x2go, FreeNX, and NX, in that order.
>
> Let me know if you have any questions about them.
> Pete
>
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 1
> > Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 00:11:35 -0400
> > From: John Abreau
> > To: BLU Discuss <discuss at blu.org>
> > Subject: [Discuss] Spice for a physical server?
> >
> > I was interested in trying out spice as an alternative to vnc, after
> > hearing that it uses much less bandwidth than vnc and therefore gives far
> > better performance.
> >
> > However, a google search is only turning up links about using spice to
> > connect to virtual machines.
> >
> > Is is possible to use spice to connect to a regular, non-virtual server
> in
> > order to use a graphical display on a remote server?
> >
> > The servers I want to connect to run CentOS 6.x.
> >
> >
> > --
> > John Abreau / Executive Director, Boston Linux & Unix
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 2
> > Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 07:19:27 -0400
> > From: Jerry Feldman
> > To: discuss at blu.org
> > Subject: Re: [Discuss] Spice for a physical server?
>
> > On 03/21/2013 12:11 AM, John Abreau wrote:
> >> I was interested in trying out spice as an alternative to vnc, after
> >> hearing that it uses much less bandwidth than vnc and therefore gives
> far
> >> better performance.
> >>
> >> However, a google search is only turning up links about using spice to
> >> connect to virtual machines.
> >>
> >> Is is possible to use spice to connect to a regular, non-virtual server
> in
> >> order to use a graphical display on a remote server?
> >>
> >> The servers I want to connect to run CentOS 6.x.
> >>
> >>
> > Ditto except I want to be able to run a spice client on Windows 7. I
> > currently run Thunderbird under X.
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 5
> > Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 11:16:41 -0400
> > From: Rich Pieri
> > To: BLU Discuss <discuss at blu.org>
> > Subject: Re: [Discuss] Spice for a physical server?
>
> > --On Thursday, March 21, 2013 12:11 AM -0400 John Abreau
> >  wrote:
> >
> >> Is is possible to use spice to connect to a regular, non-virtual server
> in
> >> order to use a graphical display on a remote server?
> >
> > SPICE is not a remote/virtual desktop system like VNC or RDP. It is a
> video
> > driver that talks to a SPICE server compiled into QEMU. It may be
> possible
> > to create a SPICE driver that incorporates the SPICE server component
> > directly but such a thing does not currently exist that I can quickly
> find.
> >
> > --
> > Rich P.
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at blu.org
> http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>



-- 
John Abreau / Executive Director, Boston Linux & Unix
PGP KeyID: 32A492D8 / Email: abreauj at gmail.com
PGP FP: 7834 AEC2 EFA3 565C A4B6  9BA4 0ACB AD85 32A4 92D8



BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities.

Valid HTML 4.01! Valid CSS!



Boston Linux & Unix / webmaster@blu.org