Boston Linux & Unix (BLU) Home | Calendar | Mail Lists | List Archives | Desktop SIG | Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings
Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Blog | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU

BLU Discuss list archive


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Discuss] SSD



Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
> ...that's why things like ZFS and BTRFS implement OS-level
> checksumming of filesystems...
> 
> USB flash drives don't all have FEC or any error correction at all.  I have
> actually experienced enough bit errors from USB fobs, that I simply don't
> use them for anything anymore.  If I need usb storage, I use a hard drive or
> nothing.

Why not use an error correcting file system on them?


>> Does it make sense to have a
>> raid setup for redundancy? Or just trust the drives will work fine? 
> 
> If you would use redundant HDD's in the same situation, then use redudnant
> SSD's.  You choose the redundancy level of your storage purely by the value
> of your data...

"Value of your data" is a little misleading, as "RAID is not backup."
The more accurate statements is "value of your data availability."

 -Tom

-- 
Tom Metro
Venture Logic, Newton, MA, USA
"Enterprise solutions through open source."
Professional Profile: http://tmetro.venturelogic.com/



BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities.

Valid HTML 4.01! Valid CSS!



Boston Linux & Unix / webmaster@blu.org