BLU Discuss list archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Discuss] Jury finds that Google did not violate any patents.

Subject: [Discuss] Jury finds that Google did not violate any patents.
From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 17:20:26 -0400
In-reply-to: <4FBFDAEA.6030209@blu.org>
References: <4FBF87EC.4080703@blu.org> <4FBF99A4.4050203@gmail.com> <4FBFDAEA.6030209@blu.org>

On May 25, 2012, at 3:18 PM, Jerry Feldman wrote:
> 
> Essentially, it is not about recouping their investment in a failing
> computer company, recouping their investment in the litigation. They had

I'm not so sure.  A significant chunk of Oracle's $7.4b spent buying Sun was to obtain James Gosling's patent specifically for the purpose of suing Google into submission.  A few million is a small expense compared to what Oracle wants to cut out of Google.

--Rich P.

Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] Jury finds that Google did not violate any patents.
  - From: gaf at blu.org (Jerry Feldman)

References:
- [Discuss] Jury finds that Google did not violate any patents.
  - From: gaf at blu.org (Jerry Feldman)
- [Discuss] Jury finds that Google did not violate any patents.
  - From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] Jury finds that Google did not violate any patents.
  - From: gaf at blu.org (Jerry Feldman)

Prev by Date: [Discuss] Jury finds that Google did not violate any patents.
Next by Date: [Discuss] More Fun in ZFSland
Previous by thread: [Discuss] Jury finds that Google did not violate any patents.
Next by thread: [Discuss] Jury finds that Google did not violate any patents.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread


BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities.

Boston Linux & Unix / webmaster@blu.org