Boston Linux & Unix (BLU) Home | Calendar | Mail Lists | List Archives | Desktop SIG | Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings
Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Blog | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU

BLU Discuss list archive


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Discuss] LVM Snapshot Wrapup



> From: David Miller [mailto:david3d at gmail.com]
> 
> Yeah Fedora's problem was that there isn't a fsck utility.? Which is kind
of odd
> b/c with a COW fully check summed file system that stores data in multiple
> places for redundancy the actual use case for a fsck utility doesn't seem
to be
> there.? 

FWIW, there is no fsck in ZFS either.  They figure it's unnecessary, and
it's very rare anyone needs/wants such a thing.  The world moves on...

Both zfs & btrfs have scrub (or scan).  Have for a long time.




BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities.

Valid HTML 4.01! Valid CSS!



Boston Linux & Unix / webmaster@blu.org