Boston Linux & Unix (BLU) Home | Calendar | Mail Lists | List Archives | Desktop SIG | Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings
Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Blog | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU

BLU Discuss list archive


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Discuss] Fwd: Fwd: Windows 8, Bootloader Signing



On Sep 21, 2011, at 9:34 PM, Greg Rundlett (freephile) wrote:
> 
> Is there a technical reason why this can't be made an option? Instead of
> every windows 8 machine being controlled can't the user decide?

Secure boot protocol is not required for Windows 8.  It is only mandatory for new units that have the "Windows 8" logo sticker on the chassis.  Existing units that meet Windows 8's technical requirements will not require secure boot.  New units that don't ship with the sticker won't require secure boot.  Tom's Hardware DIY guide kit with Windows 8 OEM editions won't require secure boot.

This whole secure boot scare is just a heaping pile of FUD.  It is a death knell but not for Linux or *BSD or Solaris.  It's a death knell for the legacy PC BIOS.

--Rich P.




BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities.

Valid HTML 4.01! Valid CSS!



Boston Linux & Unix / webmaster@blu.org