 |
Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Blog | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
|
Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Blog | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Dec 10, 2010, at 11:21 PM, Edward Ned Harvey wrote: >> From: Jarod Wilson [mailto:jarod-ajLrJawYSntWk0Htik3J/w at public.gmane.org] >> >> Again, honest, Red Hat isn't doing anything nefarious. This is just >> reality here: a rebuild isn't 100% the same thing, so expecting it >> to be 100% compatible is fool-hardy, as is getting mad at Red Hat >> when reality bites. > > Agreed with everything, unless you're implying somebody's mad at redhat. Apologies, "blaming" would have been more apropos than "getting mad at" there. At least, it certainly felt to me like Red Hat was getting the blame for Dell's software not working on CentOS. :) -- Jarod Wilson jarod-ajLrJawYSntWk0Htik3J/w at public.gmane.org
 |
|
| BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
| We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. | |
