BLU Discuss list archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

GIT vs. CVS vs. SVN

Subject: GIT vs. CVS vs. SVN
From: gaf-mNDKBlG2WHs at public.gmane.org (Jerry Feldman)
Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2010 15:32:20 -0500

Our office has been adding some new developers, and I've been asked to 
set up GIT. Fortunately our company supports GIT, but the R&D main 
source control system is CVS. I'm looking for some rational discussion 
from developers who have used both GIT and either CVS or SVN. Linus has 
standardized on GIT for kernel development.

There is a conceptual shift when using GIT vs. the traditional 
centralized repository approach using CVS.

-- 
Jerry Feldman<gaf-mNDKBlG2WHs at public.gmane.org>
Boston Linux and Unix
PGP key id: 537C5846
PGP Key fingerprint: 3D1B 8377 A3C0 A5F2 ECBB  CA3B 4607 4319 537C 5846

Prev by Date: NoMachine and Neatx
Next by Date: GIT vs. CVS vs. SVN
Previous by thread: bash - ignore dot files for autocompletion?
Next by thread: GIT vs. CVS vs. SVN
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread


BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities.

Boston Linux & Unix / webmaster@blu.org