Boston Linux & Unix (BLU) Home | Calendar | Mail Lists | List Archives | Desktop SIG | Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings
Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Blog | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU

BLU Discuss list archive


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Observational humor



markw wrote:
| I'm compiling a custom Linux kernel.  Sort of walking down memory lane as
| it were. Can someone please explain to me how doing this in 2009, with a
| very fast dual core CPU and very fast SATA disks takes LONGER than it did
| back in 1999 (10 years ago)? (rhetorical question)
|
| I mean come on? How much faster are systems today than 10 years ago? Has
| the Linux kernel REALLY grown that much?

It may also be partly due to growing C compilers, that do a lot  more
optimizing  than they used to.  If you still have a compiler that you
were using back then, you might try feeding a  few  kernel  files  to
both compilers and see how long they take.

It reminds me of this quote:

| The most amazing achievement of the computer software industry
| is  its  continuing  cancellation of the steady and staggering
| gains made by the computer hardware industry ...
-- Henry Petroski

--
I ??? Unicode






BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities.

Valid HTML 4.01! Valid CSS!



Boston Linux & Unix / webmaster@blu.org