Boston Linux & Unix (BLU) Home | Calendar | Mail Lists | List Archives | Desktop SIG | Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings
Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Blog | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU

BLU Discuss list archive


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Discuss Digest, Vol 14, Issue 5



I haven't used a Cisco router, per se' but we used a Cisco Local 
Director a while back when I was at FAST. After that, we used an Alteon 
system at another job. Last thing I used was Linux Virtual Server. 
(http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/).

I think the web server load balancing is pretty pedestrian these days 
and a couple fairly modern Linux boxes running LVS will do almost 
everything you could want at that level. I doubt anything would beat 
them on a gigabit switch.

Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 14:54:01 -0800 (PST)
> From: Dave Peters <gameslover987-/E1597aS9LQAvxtiuMwx3w at public.gmane.org>
> Subject: Other questions - Cisco switch for load balancing
> To: discuss-mNDKBlG2WHs at public.gmane.org
> Message-ID: <774474.55422.qm-kXW2xME62oivuULXzWHTWIglqE1Y4D90QQ4Iyu8u01E at public.gmane.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> Hi all,
>
> Other questions about cisco router for load balancing. I am looking for the options for load balancing for the web server. If anyone has any experience using cisco switch for load balancing. I don't know it is good or not.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Dave
>   






BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities.

Valid HTML 4.01! Valid CSS!



Boston Linux & Unix / webmaster@blu.org