Re: editor wars! vim vs. emacs. WIMPY vs. fullscreen.

["Jerry Feldman-2" <user=4@nabble.blu.org>]

 On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 23:00:36 -0500 
"Samuel Baldwin" <[hidden email]> wrote: 

> Point taken. I'm actually looking at vile and microemacs right now. 
> Both seem to hurt less than normal emacs. My primary complaint about 
> emacs is the bulk, and these both cut down on it. Further bulletins as 
> events warrant. 

That would have been an issue years ago. I used to run emacs (I was 
using Gosling Emacs back then) when I logged in and kept it up 
continuously.  Later, in the 90s on the Alpha boxes, load time was much 
reduced. 

-- 
-- 
Jerry Feldman <[hidden email]> 
Boston Linux and Unix 
PGP key id: 537C5846 
PGP Key fingerprint: 3D1B 8377 A3C0 A5F2 ECBB  CA3B 4607 4319 537C 5846 
_______________________________________________ 
Discuss mailing list 
[hidden email] 
http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss