Boston Linux & Unix (BLU) Home | Calendar | Mail Lists | List Archives | Desktop SIG | Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings
Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Blog | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU

BLU Discuss list archive


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Gnumeric 0.67



 On Tue, 2008-02-05 at 07:44 -0500, Jerry Feldman wrote: 
> On Mon, 4 Feb 2008 21:33:43 -0800 
> "Kristian Erik Hermansen" <[hidden email]> wrote: 
> 
> > Now, most recent 64-bit distros include 32-bit glibc and other libs 
> > and run 32-bit executables, so the architecture would not matter.  I 
> > have only tried this with x86-32 -> x86-64, and never had to touch an 
> > IA64 box, so I am not sure about that :-(  Obviously, going from PPC32 
> > -> IA64 would definitely not work, but I still wonder if you could 
> > build a static binary on x86-32 without using the IA64 extensions and 
> > run it.  Hrmm, next time I get my hands on one I will try (I am IA64 
> > naive)... 
> 
> IA64 is a 64-bit architecture unrelated and incompatible with the x86 
> architecture. 


BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities.

Valid HTML 4.01! Valid CSS!



Boston Linux & Unix / webmaster@blu.org