Boston Linux & Unix (BLU) Home | Calendar | Mail Lists | List Archives | Desktop SIG | Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings
Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Blog | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU

BLU Discuss list archive


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: PostgreSQL vs MySQL Throughdown! Teams?



 
On Mon, 2008-01-14 at 09:53 -0500, Mark Woodward wrote: 

> > 
> > If you guys are going to do this for real, someone should provide 2 
> > sets of identical hardware and OS.  We should also invite the MySQL 
> > Meetup.com (http://mysql.meetup.com/137/) group. 
> >   
> I don't see why we need two sets of hardware. One computer running the 
> test one after the other. There is nothing more identical than "same." 

I think it should be 2 identical systems for the following reason: The 
placement on the hard drives of the data could alter the outcome of the 
tests, especially if there's fragmentation and the like. 

2 Identical freshly-installed systems, and the FS settings should be 
tuned on both machines to max performance, like noatime, commit=60, etc. 

Or it could be one system, but the system should be reinstalled afresh 
between tests. 

-Fred 



-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and 
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is 
believed to be clean. 

_______________________________________________ 
Discuss mailing list 
[hidden email] 
http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
 


BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities.

Valid HTML 4.01! Valid CSS!



Boston Linux & Unix / webmaster@blu.org