Boston Linux & Unix (BLU) Home | Calendar | Mail Lists | List Archives | Desktop SIG | Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings
Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Blog | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU

BLU Discuss list archive


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Stripped kernel source tree



 On Nov 23, 2007, at 11:56, jbk wrote: 

> Jarod Wilson replied to: 
>> On Nov 23, 2007, at 10:01, jbk wrote: 
>>> I am running fedora on an x86_64 system. I compile my own kernels   
>>> as a normal user. I do not use rpmbuild other than for the   
>>> initial source creation from the .spec file. I use instead the   
>>> traditional make sequence of oldconfig, menuconfig, and then make   
>>> binrpm-pkg. I then install the package and configure grub as   
>>> root. This works fine for me and I have had no problems doing it   
>>> this way. What I don't know how to do is make the equivalent of   
>>> the kernel-devel package for my custom kernel typically installed   
>>> at /usr/src/kernels/. I know that the rpmbuild route will do this   
>>> for me but I don't want to keep the tree for kernels that I don't   
>>> want so it seems a waste to go that route. 
>> Uh, what? What do you mean "don't want to keep the tree for   
>> kernels that I don't want"? Are you referring to variant kernels?   
>> (i.e., kernel-smp, kernel-pae, kernel-xen). 
> 
> I want to keep the build process compact and not build the -devel   
> tree if I'm not keeping that build. I prefer not to make rpm's   
> except that it makes it easier to uninstall. 


BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities.

Valid HTML 4.01! Valid CSS!



Boston Linux & Unix / webmaster@blu.org