 |
Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Blog | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
|
Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Blog | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On 6/3/07, Samuel Baldwin <shardz4217-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w at public.gmane.org> wrote: > You'd probably be better off just using something hyper-secure, try OpenBSD. > And yeah, any distro can do pretty much any job with enough tweaking. The > good choice is how easy/and ready it is. Yes, if you really want a secure server, use OpenBSD. Only two remote exploits against the default installation in ten years. That's good security :-) Of course, nothing can prevent a lazy admin from making BSD/Linux/Unix even less secure... -- Kristian Hermansen -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
 |
|
| BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
| We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. | |
