BLU Discuss list archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

LVM + RAID follow up

Subject: LVM + RAID follow up
From: richb at pioneer.ci.net (Rich Braun)
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 14:07:49 -0500 (EST)
In-reply-to: <2702.192.168.2.251.1162925870.squirrel@envoy.ci.net>
References: <1402.192.168.2.251.1162834661.squirrel@envoy.ci.net><sjmwt68i6n2.fsf@ cliodev.pgp.com><3082.192.168.2.251.1162861214.squirrel@envoy.ci.net> <sjmr6wfgnmb.fsf@cliodev.pgp.com> <2702.192.168.2.251.1162925870.squirrel@envoy.ci.net>

I wrote:
> Apply the same logic, you get available storage of 6 times 1 TB plus
> 3 times .8 TB equals 7.8 TB.

OK I got an A in freshman calculus but still can't multiply ;-).  8.4 TB would
be the above answer.  Honest, congregation, I didn't actually *use* the meth,
or have sex with that...  ;-)

-rich

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

References:
- LVM + RAID follow up
  - From: richb at pioneer.ci.net (Rich Braun)
- LVM + RAID follow up
  - From: richb at pioneer.ci.net (Rich Braun)
- LVM + RAID follow up
  - From: warlord at MIT.EDU (Derek Atkins)
- LVM + RAID follow up
  - From: richb at pioneer.ci.net (Rich Braun)

Prev by Date: LVM + RAID follow up
Next by Date: Samba question
Previous by thread: LVM + RAID follow up
Next by thread: LVM + RAID follow up
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread


BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities.

Boston Linux & Unix / webmaster@blu.org