Oracle respins Red Hat (sort of)...

[gaf at blu.org (Jerry Feldman)]

On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 15:48:30 -0500
Christoph Doerbeck <christoph at linuxsoup.com> wrote:

> I just searched the BLU archives and didn't spot any threads on the
> Oracle announcement.  I am curious to here what opinions you folks have.
> 
> What motivated Larry E. to make such a move?
> Does anyone think this is a good idea for Oracle (share holders)?  
> Do you think they can succeed at delivering a long term Linux solution?
I don't think it is a good idea for Linux. I think that Larry's
motivation is to have an Oracle optimized Linux. It is expensive for
Oracle to work with the existing distros. 

If I were a data center manager, I would probably prefer to have a
single enterprise distribution in the center. But, if the Oracle distro
would provide me with a significant performance improvement for Oracle,
I would probably opt to obtain that distro. But if it did not provide
me with a significant benefit either cost, performance, or support I
would probably prefer one of the other distros, primarily Red Hat or
Novell.

-- 
Jerry Feldman <gaf at blu.org>
Boston Linux and Unix user group
http://www.blu.org PGP key id:C5061EA9
PGP Key fingerprint:053C 73EC 3AC1 5C44 3E14 9245 FB00 3ED5 C506 1EA9
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.blu.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20061031/1350bd8c/attachment.sig>