Boston Linux & Unix (BLU) Home | Calendar | Mail Lists | List Archives | Desktop SIG | Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings
Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Blog | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU

BLU Discuss list archive


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

IP hack theorizing



Tom Metro wrote:
> Jerry Feldman wrote:
>> David Kramer <david at thekramers.net> wrote:
>>> The IP envelope contains the total length of the datagram.  What would
>>> happen if that number were larger or smaller than the real length?
>>
>> I think the network layer in most implementations has been purged of
>> buffer overflow issues. Most likely, the affected packet would simply
>> be discarded...
> 
> Or corrected. I believe modern software firewalls, like iptables,
> perform a number of sanity checks on packets before they hit the kernel.
> For example, here's a recent log entry triggered by iptables when it
> didn't like the window size specified in a packet:
> 
>  ... TCP: Treason uncloaked! Peer 192.168.0.200:873/59982 shrinks window
> 1150916075:1150916611. Repaired.

Spectacularly cool!  Thanks.

BTW, I'm in the process of asking whether I can publish the paper here.
 There's nothing earth-shattering that real sysadmins don't already
know, but it might be useful for the home users.


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.





BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities.

Valid HTML 4.01! Valid CSS!



Boston Linux & Unix / webmaster@blu.org