Boston Linux & Unix (BLU) Home | Calendar | Mail Lists | List Archives | Desktop SIG | Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings
Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Blog | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU

BLU Discuss list archive


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Which database...



On Wednesday 15 June 2005 3:47 pm, Kyle Plummer wrote:
> Although not directly a linux question?  I have a client who is thinking
> about using Oracle, IBM or MS SQL for a large DB project.  His question
> to me is which is a more stable/reliable/scalable database?
>
> Thanks for your input.
MS SQL locks you into a Windows server. 
Both the IBM and Oracle products are good. Oracle has very strong support 
for Linux on a number of platforms and fully supports 64-bits. The real 
advantage of using a 64-bit platform for a database is its large linear 
address space. AFAIK, on the x86-64 architecture, you can build 32-bit apps 
to connect to a 64-bit Oracle 64-bit database.

-- 
Jerry Feldman <gaf at blu.org>
Boston Linux and Unix user group
http://www.blu.org PGP key id:C5061EA9
PGP Key fingerprint:053C 73EC 3AC1 5C44 3E14 9245 FB00 3ED5 C506 1EA9




BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities.

Valid HTML 4.01! Valid CSS!



Boston Linux & Unix / webmaster@blu.org