to linux or not to linux...

[dhml at comcast.net (David Hummel)]

On Mon, Dec 20, 2004 at 10:48:01PM -0500, Derek Martin wrote:
> 
> Sure, Linux existed before Red Hat; but in a very real sense, it
> wouldn't be what it is today without them.
>
> [ etc. etc. ]

You've made some good arguments about enterprise Linux, and I don't
dispute any of it.  You would have to be blind to not recognize Red
Hat's past and current contributions and its continuing influence.
Unfortunately, this doesn't provide any justification for installing
RHEL on a laptop (sorry Stephen).

-David