BLU Discuss list archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RHEL forks (was: to linux or not to linux...)

Subject: RHEL forks (was: to linux or not to linux...)
From: dhml at comcast.net (David Hummel)
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2004 13:15:14 -0500
In-reply-to: <41C70AEF.80809@banta-im.com>
References: <1103557649.6103.20.camel@localhost.localdomain> <41C70AEF.80809@banta-im.com>

On Mon, Dec 20, 2004 at 12:25:03PM -0500, Matthew Valites wrote:
>
> Redhat enterprise is no where near the most current.  If you want that
> stability, try whitebox linux.  It's based off of RHEL. 
> 
> http://www.whiteboxlinux.org/index.html

White Box is maintained by one guy, so there may be issues with timely
updates etc.

You may want to consider CentOS instead:

  http://www.centos.org/

-David

References:
- to linux or not to linux...
  - From: adler at stephenadler.com (Stephen Adler)
- to linux or not to linux...
  - From: mvalites at banta-im.com (Matthew Valites)

Prev by Date: to linux or not to linux...
Next by Date: Speakers and topics for next year for the BLU
Previous by thread: to linux or not to linux...
Next by thread: to linux or not to linux...
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread


BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities.

Boston Linux & Unix / webmaster@blu.org