Boston Linux & Unix (BLU) Home | Calendar | Mail Lists | List Archives | Desktop SIG | Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings
Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Blog | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU

BLU Discuss list archive


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

the linux networking utilities hate me



Seth Gordon wrote:
> Grant Young wrote:
> 
>> Maybe this will help?
>>
>> route add default gw 192.168.1.245

Yep, tried that, no luck.

When I boot the machine up and it reads the network configuration file, 
and I type route -n, I get

Destination    Gateway       Genmask          Flags ....
192.168.1.245  0.0.0.0       255.255.255.255  UH    ....
0.0.0.0        192.168.1.245 0.0.0.0          UG    ....

When I type "ifconfig eth1", it reports an address of 192.168.1.13, 
broadcast 192.168.1.255, netmask 255.255.255.255.  The base station has 
(according to its Web interface) address 192.168.1.245, netmask 
255.255.255.0, gateway 192.168.1.1.

I can use the wireless card on my wife's new Windows laptop to reach the 
rest of the Net through the base station, so it seems that everything on 
that end is set up properly.

// seth gordon // sethg at ropine.com // http://dynamic.ropine.com/yo //





BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities.

Valid HTML 4.01! Valid CSS!



Boston Linux & Unix / webmaster@blu.org