Boston Linux & Unix (BLU) Home | Calendar | Mail Lists | List Archives | Desktop SIG | Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings
Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Blog | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU

BLU Discuss list archive


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

playing safely...



On Sat, 3 Jan 2004 dsr at tao.merseine.nu wrote:

> Bochs is slow, yes. It has to be: it's a complete emulation of hardware,
> not just virtualization of software.

But isn't VMware also a hardware emulator? I thought that the two of them
were doing roughly the same thing, but VMware has a reputation for being
far snappier than Bochs.

I know that Wine isn't an emulator -- hence the "wine is not an emulator"
expansion of the name -- which is why it's faster but bound to x86
hardware. Bochs on the other hand does emulate the hardware, but now that
I think about it I don't remember whether VMware does or not...

</unhelpful>


-- 
Chris Devers




BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities.

Valid HTML 4.01! Valid CSS!



Boston Linux & Unix / webmaster@blu.org