AARRRRGH!!! (was RE: Linux Install error)

[ed at eh3.com (Ed Hill)]

On Wed, 2003-12-17 at 22:45, Don Levey wrote:
> I've just spent a most frustrating 36 hours.
> 
> I've been putting together a new machine (hardware specs below), and
> attempting to create a dual boot (Win2k and Fedora).  The Win2k installation
> went smoothly.  Linux, not so much.

Hi Don,

Last week I installed RH 9 on an ASUS A7V600.  I know, its *not* the
same board -- has different North and South Bridges.  But the install
went very smoothly.  Could you could try Red Hat 9?

In my (limited) experience, RH 9 seems to have slightly better hardware
support than Fedora Core 1 (FC1 gave me *fits* with a certain 3Com NIC
that had worked nicely w/ RH 9).  I'm sure the Fedora project will
improve over time but for the moment I'd try the slightly older distro.

good luck,
Ed

-- 
Edward H. Hill III, PhD
office:  MIT Dept. of EAPS;  Room 54-1424;  77 Massachusetts Ave.
            Cambridge, MA 02139-4307
email:   eh3 at mit.edu,  ed at eh3.com
URL:     http://web.mit.edu/eh3/
phone:   617-253-0098
fax:     617-253-4464
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.blu.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20031217/b7c721ef/attachment.sig>