Boston Linux & Unix (BLU) Home | Calendar | Mail Lists | List Archives | Desktop SIG | Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings
Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Blog | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU

BLU Discuss list archive


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Rebuilding



On Sat, 2003-09-20 at 23:02, matt galster wrote:
> Thanks, Mark.
> 
> I'd noticed that the SuSE version was put up without support because SuSE
> people wanted one for themselves.  I guess that settles SuSE.  I guess now
> I'll need to decide about gentoo as well.  Anyone have a feel for the
> maturity of that dist?  It isn't like RH or SuSE with a pedigree, AFAIK.

I have a coworker who has been playing with gentoo as of late.  He likes
the fact that the software has a tendency to be cutting/bleeding edge,
and he likes to feel as though he's getting more speed out of everything
because it's compiled specifically for his setup.  Truth be told none of
us can really see a difference.

I will say that the maturity seems lacking to a minor extent.  I played
with it briefly and had the package mechanism (called "emerge") barf on
me a little bit.  Admittedly, that could have been my fault.

In any case, Debian (stable) is very much that - a stable distro. 
However, don't expect cutting edge stuff.  If you have an x86 machine,
you can find alternative apt sources that have newer software - that may
be tougher for an alpha.

I guess it all comes down to "Waddaya gonna do with the system once it's
running?"  8)

-- 
"Things are fine, the upcoming semester approaches like a brick wall
 and we're in a 1962 Corvair with no brakes."  - Paul Sand

Cole Tuininga
Lead Developer
Code Energy, Inc
colet at code-energy.com
PGP Key ID: 0x43E5755D






BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities.

Valid HTML 4.01! Valid CSS!



Boston Linux & Unix / webmaster@blu.org