Is RedHat 9 stable?

[jabr at abreau.net (John Abreau)]

On Sun, 2003-07-06 at 00:44, Bill Horne wrote:

> I'm currently running RedHat 7.3, and would like to upgrade to RedHat 9.
> 
> If you're using v 9, please tell me if it's stable.
> 

I'm using Redhat 9 on my workstation and my laptop, and it's been 
rock solid for me as a workstation. For a server, I've found that 
a lot of apache/mod_perl web applications don't work, because 
Redhat is using apache 2.x and mod_perl 2.x, and these packages 
depend on some basic features in mod_perl 1.x that either haven't 
been implemented in 2.x yet, or have changed their syntax enough 
to break the packages. 


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 307 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.blu.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20030706/3da529c8/attachment.sig>