Boston Linux & Unix (BLU) Home | Calendar | Mail Lists | List Archives | Desktop SIG | Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings
Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Blog | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU

BLU Discuss list archive


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[OT] Visual C++ question



On Fri, 14 Feb 2003 13:50:52 -0500
"Chuck Young" <chy at genuity.com> wrote:

> I used Borland a while ago ('96) and all my C code got saved as *.cpp.
> 
> If there is a reason the complier needs to process using just the C
> subset of C++, I think that's what Jerry wants to know.  Windows likes
> three character suffixes and probably does not understand *.c
C is not a subset of C++ and C++ is not a superset of C. There are C
constructs that are illegal in C++ and conversely there are constructs
in C++ that are different in C. 

I think that Grant answered my question. The suffix alone will not force
VC++ to shift to C mode. 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.blu.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20030214/7f6bd75b/attachment.sig>



BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities.

Valid HTML 4.01! Valid CSS!



Boston Linux & Unix / webmaster@blu.org