Boston Linux & Unix (BLU) Home | Calendar | Mail Lists | List Archives | Desktop SIG | Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings
Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Blog | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU

BLU Discuss list archive


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Mandrake vs. Red Hat



On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 10:50:11AM -0400, K. Ari Krupnikov wrote:
> Kent Borg <kentborg at borg.org> writes:
> 
> > I've got a question: Which is better, Mandrake or Red Hat?  Why?
> 
> Is this a troll :=?

I try not to be.  It seemed this might be a quiet enough place for
such a question.

For example, I have heard that Mandrake put a lot of effort into
making Linux more usable and more easily maintainable?  To what extent
did they succeed?  What was the cost?  (Can one do compatible
text-based admin work?)

It seems there are matters of substance that don't have to reduce to
shouting.


-kb





BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities.

Valid HTML 4.01! Valid CSS!



Boston Linux & Unix / webmaster@blu.org