Boston Linux & Unix (BLU) Home | Calendar | Mail Lists | List Archives | Desktop SIG | Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings
Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Blog | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU

BLU Discuss list archive


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

2nd hard disk for MySQL/PostgreSQL database under RedHat 7.2



I agree with this. The issue is how the system will be used. If you need throughput, SCSI will give 
you better throughput. 

For home use, even a home server, IDE is probably sufficient. If you are using this for a small 
business with a few users, again, IDE is probably sufficient, but as the disk traffic increases, SCSI 
wins. 

You also need to consider where to place the swap file. 

On 25 Feb 2002 at 12:27, Patrick R. McManus wrote:
> if your limiting factor is network - go ide.. but if parallel load is
> your big issue - you'll do a lot more a lot faster with scsi.
Jerry Feldman <gaf at blu.org>
Associate Director
Boston Linux and Unix user group
http://www.blu.org PGP key id:C5061EA9
PGP Key fingerprint:053C 73EC 3AC1 5C44 3E14 9245 FB00 3ED5 C506 1EA9





BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities.

Valid HTML 4.01! Valid CSS!



Boston Linux & Unix / webmaster@blu.org