Check out Boston.com today. Article about the BLU

[gaf at blu.org (Jerry Feldman)]

Actually Windows is relatively easy to install. It just requires somewhere 
between 9,000 and 9,250 boots. A stock install of Mandrake or Corel one 
a platform where all the hardware is supported by Linux is actually better 
than Windows. But, once you start throwing in choices, such as which 
desktop, KDE or Gnome, networking, you have more choices. I would 
like to get her at an installfest with a desktop system whith supported 
everything, then we should install Linux from scratch and Windows from 
scratch. The real difference is that with Linux (or BSD) we have more 
software (such as compilers which are not included with Windows), and 
more choices (how many windows managers do we have?). 

On 17 Mar 00, at 12:25, John Chambers wrote:

> One thing I note is that she compares the  difficulty  of  installing
> linux with the ease of using Windows that is pre-installed. 
Jerry Feldman <gaf at blu.org>
Associate Director
Boston Linux and Unix user group
http://www.blu.org
-
Subcription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with
"subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" on the first line of the
message body to discuss-request at blu.org (Subject line is ignored).